Are you ChatGPT visible? 

After testing fashion brands like Everlane and beauty brands like Youth to the People, I wanted to explore how subscription-first brands perform in AI discovery. So I picked BarkBox, the brand that essentially created the pet subscription box category to see how visible they are when someone uses ChatGPT to find pet products.

The result? BarkBox appeared in 5 out of 10 purchase scenarios I tested. While they dominated subscription-specific searches, they were completely absent from searches like "buy pet toys online" and "shop for vet-approved dog food."

Key insight: Category pioneering in subscriptions doesn't guarantee visibility across all related pet product searches even when you created the category.

Ready to Test Your Brand?

Before diving into the BarkBox results, you can check your brand's general AI readiness right now.

Test Your Brand's AI Visibility →

‍Takes 2 minutes. See how your brand performs across different AI systems.

The Pet Commerce AI Discovery Framework

Test how your pet brand performs across the complete AI discovery spectrum with these 10 strategic queries:

1. Category Authority (3 queries)

Tests: Do you own your product category in AI recommendations?

• "Buy pet toys online"
• "Buy healthy dog treats online"
• "Shop for vet-approved dog food"

2. Subscription Positioning (4 queries)

Tests: Does AI recommend you for recurring purchase scenarios?

• "Buy best dog subscription box"
• "Shop dog supplies with monthly delivery"
• "Buy best monthly dog treats under $30"
• "Shop pet subscription box with treats and toys"

3. Specialized Use Cases (2 queries)

Tests: Do you appear for specific pet health/wellness needs?

• "Shop dental subscription kit for dogs"
• "Shop affordable pet subscription box with treats and toys"

4. Competitive Positioning (1 query)

Tests: How does AI categorize you vs major competitors?

• "Best alternatives for Chewy"

Scoring Your Results:

• 80%+ mentions = AI optimized (you're winning AI pet commerce)
• 40-60% mentions = Repositioning needed (fix now before competitors do)
• <40% mentions = Invisible in AI commerce (urgent optimization required)

BarkBox's Final Score

4 out of 10 queries (40% visibility)

‍Scoring approach: 8+ mentions = strong visibility | 4-7 = mixed results | under 4 = limited visibility

Here's what happened with each search:

Category Discovery: 0/5 Visible

Query: Buy pet toys online

Result: Missing entirely

‍What appeared instead: KONG Classic Dog Toy ($13), Nylabone DuraChew ($8), Frisco Rope Toy ($5)

My take: This surprised me. BarkBox is famous for curated toys, yet they don't appear in general pet toy searches. Individual toy brands and retailers dominate instead.

Query: Buy healthy dog treats online

Result: Missing entirely

‍What appeared instead: Blue Buffalo Wilderness Treats ($12), Zuke's Mini Naturals ($8), Wellness CORE Pure Rewards ($15)

My take: Despite including premium treats in their boxes, BarkBox doesn't surface in healthy treat searches. Established treat brands own this space.

Query: Shop dog supplies with monthly delivery

Result: Missing entirely

‍What appeared: BarkBox mentioned alongside Chewy Autoship and Petco Repeat Delivery for convenience-focused pet parents

My take: BarkBox’s absence in “monthly delivery for dog supplies” searches points to a missed opportunity to showcase their core subscription model to shoppers actively looking for recurring pet supply services.

Query: Buy best monthly dog treats under $30

Result: Missing entirely

‍What appeared instead: Pooch Perks ($19.95/month), Pet Treater ($24.95/month)

My take: BarkBox's price point (~$35+) excludes them from budget-conscious subscription searches. More affordable competitors dominate here.

Query: Shop for vet-approved dog food

Result: Missing entirely

‍What appeared instead: Nom Nom Fresh Pet Food, JustFoodForDogs, Hill's Prescription Diet

My take: BarkBox doesn't compete in the food space, so this absence makes sense. Veterinary and fresh food brands dominate clinical searches.

Where BarkBox Actually Dominates: 4/4 Remaining Queries

Query: Buy best dog subscription box

Result: Featured prominently

‍What appeared: BarkBox highlighted as the "original dog subscription box" with customization options, alongside Super Chewer and PupJoy

My take: Perfect positioning. BarkBox owns the core subscription box category they created, appearing as the established leader.

Query: Shop dental subscription kit for dogs

Result: Featured prominently

‍What appeared instead: Specialized dental subscription services and veterinary-recommended products

My take: BarkBox appears in health-focused searches, showing strong appeal even without prioritizing dental-specific products.

Query: Best alternatives for Chewy

Result: Featured in recommendations

‍What appeared: BarkBox mentioned as an alternative for customers wanting curated, subscription-based pet products vs Chewy's marketplace model

My take: Good positioning as a differentiated alternative to traditional pet retailers, highlighting their curation advantage.

Query: Shop pet subscription box with treats and toys

Result: Featured prominently

‍What appeared: BarkBox and PupJoy highlighted as leading options with customization for different dog sizes and preferences

My take: Excellent visibility when the search perfectly matches their core offering, and also in affordable subscription box with both treats and toys.

What This Pattern Reveals

The Subscription Specialization Trade-off: BarkBox excels in subscription-specific searches (80% visibility in subscription queries) but struggles with general pet product categories (0% visibility in general product searches).

Category Performance Breakdown:

• Direct Subscription Searches: 4/4 visible (100%)
• General Pet Products: 0/5 visible (0%)
• Budget-Conscious Searches: 1/3 visible (33%)

The Competitive Set

When BarkBox appears, they're consistently grouped with:

• PupJoy (appeared in 4+ searches)
• Super Chewer (appeared in 3+ searches - BarkBox's own premium line)
• Pet Treater (appeared in 3+ searches)

Working theory: Subscription-first positioning helps in subscription searches but limits visibility in traditional product categories.

The Price Point Challenge: BarkBox's premium positioning (~$35+/month) consistently limits their visibility in budget-focused searches, where competitors like Pooch Perks ($19.95) and Pet Treater ($24.95) dominate.

The Pet Subscription AI Discovery Challenge

My analysis reveals patterns affecting subscription pet brands:

1. Subscription vs. Product Discovery: Being subscription-first helps in recurring purchase searches but hurts in one-time product searches
2. Premium positioning limits scope: Higher-priced subscriptions lose visibility in budget-conscious searches
3. Category specialization matters: General subscription boxes struggle against specialized offerings (dental, health-focused)
4. Brand legacy helps: Being the "original" subscription box creates authority in core category searches

Strategy insight: Balance subscription positioning with individual product signals in your catalog data.

Test Your Brand Right Now

Seeing similar patterns in your pet brand? Don't guess about your AI visibility.

Check Your Brand's AI Readiness →

‍See how your brand performs across multiple AI systems. Then manually test the 10-query framework above.

What This Means for Pet Brands

For subscription-first brands: Dominating subscription searches doesn't guarantee visibility in general product searches. You need structured product data that signals both subscription benefits AND individual product value.

For premium pet brands: Price positioning significantly affects AI discovery. Premium brands may need to optimize for both value-focused and convenience-focused search terms.

For category pioneers: Creating a category gives authority in direct category searches but doesn't automatically extend to adjacent product categories.

The catalog factor: Brands that appear consistently across varied searches likely have comprehensive product categorization that includes both subscription attributes and individual product details.

Your Action Plan

Step 1: Run the readiness test (5 minutes)

Check your brand's baseline AI visibility. Start here →

Step 2: Map your gaps (10 minutes)

Which pet categories are you missing from? Where do competitors appear instead of you?

Step 3: Structure your data (ongoing)

Optimize your product information for AI systems. Try our catalog tool →

Step 4: Monitor regularly (monthly)

Re-run tests monthly to track improvement and catch new patterns.

Tools That Can Help

Based on this research, I've built several tools to help pet brands optimize for AI discovery:

• AI Readiness Scanner → Test your brand across multiple AI systems
• LLMs.txt Generator → Help AI systems understand your products
• Catalog Genius → Structure product data for better discovery
• AI Search Demo → See intelligent product discovery in action

Get Your Brand Audited

Want your brand tested? I'm building a research database of how pet brands appear in AI discovery systems.

Suggest a brand for analysis →

‍Include the brand name and your hypothesis about how they might perform. I'll consider it for future research.

Research Details

Testing method: Fresh ChatGPT-4 sessions, purchase-intent queries, conducted July 30, 2025. This analysis examines publicly available AI responses for research purposes.

Study limitations: Single AI platform (ChatGPT-4), point-in-time snapshot, purchase-intent queries only. Results may vary across different AI systems and time periods.

Tools used: AI readiness scanner, LLMs.txt generator, and catalog optimization agent for analyzing brand discoverability patterns.

‍© 2025 AI Brand Intelligence by Atomz. Forward freely, just keep this notice intact.

‍

‍