ON THIS PAGE
Stay Updated with latest in AI SEO
04 September 2025
After testing fashion brands like Everlane and beauty brands like Youth to the People, I wanted to explore how subscription-first brands perform in AI discovery.
So I picked BarkBox, the brand that essentially created the pet subscription box category to see how visible they are when someone uses ChatGPT to find pet products.
Before diving into the BarkBox results, you can check your brand's general AI readiness right now.
Test Your Brand's AI Visibility →
Takes 2 minutes. See how your brand performs across different AI systems.
Test how your pet brand performs across the complete AI discovery spectrum with these 9 strategic queries:
Tests: Do you own your product category in AI recommendations?
Tests: Does AI recommend you for recurring purchase scenarios?
Tests: How does AI categorize you vs major competitors?
4 out of 9 queries (44% visibility)
Scoring approach: 8+ mentions = strong visibility | 4-7 = mixed results | under 4 = limited visibility
Here's what happened with each search:
Result: Missing entirely
What appeared instead: KONG Classic Dog Toy ($13), Nylabone DuraChew ($8), Frisco Rope Toy ($5)
My take: This surprised me. BarkBox is famous for curated toys, yet they don't appear in general pet toy searches. Individual toy brands and retailers dominate instead.
Result: Missing entirely
What appeared instead: Blue Buffalo Wilderness Treats ($12), Zuke's Mini Naturals ($8), Wellness CORE Pure Rewards ($15)
My take: Despite including premium treats in their boxes, BarkBox doesn't surface in healthy treat searches. Established treat brands own this space.
Result: Missing entirely
What appeared instead: Nom Nom Fresh Pet Food, JustFoodForDogs, Hill's Prescription Diet
My take: BarkBox doesn't compete in the food space, so this absence makes sense. Veterinary and fresh food brands dominate clinical searches.
Result: Featured prominently
What appeared: BarkBox highlighted as the "original dog subscription box" with customization options, alongside Super Chewer and PupJoy
My take: Perfect positioning. BarkBox owns the core subscription box category they created, appearing as the established leader.
Result: Missing entirely
What appeared: BarkBox mentioned alongside Chewy Autoship and Petco Repeat Delivery for convenience-focused pet parents
My take: BarkBox’s absence in “monthly delivery for dog supplies” searches points to a missed opportunity to showcase their core subscription model to shoppers actively looking for recurring pet supply services.
Result: Missing entirely
What appeared instead: Pooch Perks ($19.95/month), Pet Treater ($24.95/month)
My take: BarkBox's price point (~$35+) excludes them from budget-conscious subscription searches. More affordable competitors dominate here.
Result: Featured prominently
What appeared: BarkBox and PupJoy highlighted as leading options with customization for different dog sizes and preferences
My take: Excellent visibility when the search perfectly matches their core offering, and also in affordable subscription box with both treats and toys.
Result: Featured prominently
What appeared instead: Specialized dental subscription services and veterinary-recommended products
My take: BarkBox appears in health-focused searches, showing strong appeal even without prioritizing dental-specific products.
Result: Featured in recommendations
What appeared: BarkBox mentioned as an alternative for customers wanting curated, subscription-based pet products vs Chewy's marketplace model
My take: Good positioning as a differentiated alternative to traditional pet retailers, highlighting their curation advantage.
The Subscription Specialization Trade-off: BarkBox excels in subscription-specific searches (80% visibility in subscription queries) but struggles with general pet product categories (0% visibility in general product searches).
Category Performance Breakdown:
Working theory: Subscription-first positioning helps in subscription searches but limits visibility in traditional product categories.
The Price Point Challenge: BarkBox's premium positioning (~$35+/month) consistently limits their visibility in budget-focused searches, where competitors like Pooch Perks ($19.95) and Pet Treater ($24.95) dominate.
Seeing similar patterns in your pet brand? Don't guess about your AI visibility.
Check Your Brand's AI Readiness →
See how your brand performs across multiple AI systems. Then manually test the 10-query framework above.
For subscription-first brands: Dominating subscription searches doesn't guarantee visibility in general product searches. You need structured product data that signals both subscription benefits AND individual product value.
For premium pet brands: Price positioning significantly affects AI discovery. Premium brands may need to optimize for both value-focused and convenience-focused search terms.
For category pioneers: Creating a category gives authority in direct category searches but doesn't automatically extend to adjacent product categories.
The catalog factor: Brands that appear consistently across varied searches likely have comprehensive product categorization that includes both subscription attributes and individual product details.
Check your brand's baseline AI visibility. Start here →
Which categories are you missing from? Where do competitors appear instead of you?
Optimize your product information for AI systems. Try our catalog tool →
Re-run tests monthly to track improvement and catch new patterns.
Based on this research, I've built several tools to help brands optimize for AI discovery:
• AI Readiness Scanner → Test your brand across multiple AI systems
• LLMs.txt Generator → Help AI systems understand your products
• Catalog Genius → Structure product data for better discovery
• AI Search Demo → See intelligent product discovery in action
Want your brand tested?
I'm building a research database of how pet brands appear in AI discovery systems.
Suggest a brand for analysis →
Testing method: Fresh ChatGPT-4 sessions, purchase-intent queries, conducted July 30, 2025. This analysis examines publicly available AI responses for research purposes.
Study limitations: Single AI platform (ChatGPT-4), point-in-time snapshot, purchase-intent queries only. Results may vary across different AI systems and time periods.
Tools used: AI readiness scanner, LLMs.txt generator, and catalog optimization agent for analyzing brand discoverability patterns.
© 2025 AI Brand Intelligence by Atomz. Forward freely, just keep this notice intact.
Streamline your workflow, achieve more
Richard Thomas
Create buying intent instantly
Create buying intent before customers search. 25%+ conversion lift guaranteed.
Why Prompts Matter
AI Search That Converts 3x Better
Get the latest in AI-powered search, UX trends, and eCommerce conversions—straight to your inbo
No spam. Just powerful insights.
👉 Join thousands of growth-focused brands.